This item is reproduced by permission of The Huntington Library, San Marino, California.

Letter to J. G. Fosdick, 3 February 1834

  • Source Note
  • Historical Introduction
Page 23
image
Feb. 3, 1834.
Dear Bro. [J. G.] Fosdick:
Your letter of the 10th. Jan. last is  just recd. and this day there has been a regular  of & in this place, and the subject spoken  of in your letter was, we believe, taken into due consideration.  We were very sorry to learn that Bro. J[oseph] Wood had gone  so far astray and offered such violence to the pure principles  of the Gospel of Christ. But, alas! Such is the depravity of man  when lost to a sense of the fear of God and of the ties which bind  [e]very virtuous man to the interest and happiness of his follow man.
Every principle inculcated among you which is contrary  [t]o virtue, to industry, to wisdom, to good order, to propriety,  and in fine, to the pure principles of godliness as contained in  the Scriptures of the old and new Testaments, the Book of Mormon  and the revelations and of Jesus Christ, which  have been given to his in these last days, is entirely  foreign from the feelings of our breasts, and is that upon which we  look down with feelings of the utmost disapprobation; and as consc [i]encious men who expect to render an impartial account, before  [th]e searcher of hearts, of all our transactions here, we cannot  [lo]ok upon any principle contrary to the above with any degree  [of] allowance.
After some investigation of the case of Bro. Wood, in Council,  [it] was decided that he should be cut off from the Church.  [Ac]cordingly the Council lifted their hands against him and  [he] was excluded from the church on this 3d. day of Feb. 1834.  [for] indulging an idle, partial, overbearing and lustful spirit, and  [not] magnifying his holy calling whereunto he had been  . These things were plainly manifest to the satisfaction  [of] [a]ll the council, and the Spirit constrained us to separate him  [fro]m the church. Should bro. Joseph Wood, after learning  [th]e decission of this council, truly repent of all his sins and  bring forth fruit meet to the satisfaction of that of the  Church where he has committed the offences, he can be [p. 23]
Feb. 3, 1834.
Dear Bro. J. G. Fosdick:
Your letter of the 10th. Jan. last is just recd. and this day there has been a regular of & in this place, and the subject spoken of in your letter was, we believe, taken into due consideration. We were very sorry to learn that Bro. Joseph Wood had gone so far astray and offered such violence to the pure principles of the Gospel of Christ. But, alas! Such is the depravity of man when lost to a sense of the fear of God and of the ties which bind every virtuous man to the interest and happiness of his follow man.
Every principle inculcated among you which is contrary to virtue, to industry, to wisdom, to good order, to propriety, and in fine, to the pure principles of godliness as contained in the Scriptures of the old and new Testaments, the Book of Mormon and the revelations and of Jesus Christ, which have been given to his in these last days, is entirely foreign from the feelings of our breasts, and is that upon which we look down with feelings of the utmost disapprobation; and as consciencious men who expect to render an impartial account, before the searcher of hearts, of all our transactions here, we cannot look upon any principle contrary to the above with any degree of allowance.
After some investigation of the case of Bro. Wood, in Council, it was decided that he should be cut off from the Church. Accordingly the Council lifted their hands against him and he was excluded from the church on this 3d. day of Feb. 1834. for indulging an idle, partial, overbearing and lustful spirit, and not magnifying his holy calling whereunto he had been . These things were plainly manifest to the satisfaction of [a]ll the council, and the Spirit constrained us to separate him from the church. Should bro. Joseph Wood, after learning the decission of this council, truly repent of all his sins and bring forth fruit meet to the satisfaction of that of the Church where he has committed the offences, he can be [p. 23]
Page 23