Minute Book 1

  • Source Note
  • Historical Introduction
Page 38
image
as contained in the following declaration.
Feb 19. 1834.
To the president of the high council of the church of  Christ: The following charges, I prefer against brother Curtis  Hodges Sen. an elder of this Church.
First, an error in Spirit, and secondly an error in  address, or communication: which was in loud speaking, and  a want of clearness in articulation, which was calculated to do  injury to the cause of God; and also of contending or persisting  that that was a good, or propper spirit which actuated him  to thus speak: all of which, I consider unbecomeing an elder  in this church and request a hearing before the high council
Signd .
Bro. Hodges plead not quilty of the above charges.
Father Lions was called on for evidence to substantiate the  above charges, and his testimony was pointed against bro. Hodges.  Bro. Story was then called on to tell what he knew about the  case, and he said that bro. H. talked so loud, at a prayer  meeting, that the neighbours came out to see if some one was  not hurt. At another meeting, he said that rebuked  him for his error, but he did not receive the rebuke, he said also  that he raised his voice so high that he could not articulate  so as to be understood, and that his teaching brought a  damper on the meeting, and was not edifying.
Bro. was then called upon, and he said that bro.  Hodges was guilty of hollowing so loud that he, in a measure,  lost his voice, and uttered but little else distinctly, than  Glory to heavens King,” and in fine, his testimony was  pointed against bro. H. Bro. was then called upon  and he testified about the same things.— closed the exam ination of witnesses and bro. stood up on  the part of the accuser and laid open the case  handsomely and clearly. Bro stood up on the  part of the accused, but could say but few words. [p. 38]
as contained in the following declaration.
Feb 19. 1834.
To the president of the high council of the church of Christ: The following charges, I prefer against brother Curtis Hodges Sen. an elder of this Church.
First, an error in Spirit, and secondly an error in address, or communication: which was in loud speaking, and a want of clearness in articulation, which was calculated to do injury to the cause of God; and also of contending or persisting that that was a good, or propper spirit which actuated him to thus speak: all of which, I consider unbecomeing an elder in this church and request a hearing before the high council
Signd .
Bro. Hodges plead not quilty of the above charges.
Father Lions was called on for evidence to substantiate the above charges, and his testimony was pointed against bro. Hodges. Bro. Story was then called on to tell what he knew about the case, and he said that bro. H. talked so loud, at a prayer meeting, that the neighbours came out to see if some one was not hurt. At another meeting, he said that rebuked him for his error, but he did not receive the rebuke, he said also that he raised his voice so high that he could not articulate so as to be understood, and that his teaching brought a damper on the meeting, and was not edifying.
Bro. was then called upon, and he said that bro. Hodges was guilty of hollowing so loud that he, in a measure, lost his voice, and uttered but little else distinctly, than “Glory to heavens King,” and in fine, his testimony was pointed against bro. H. Bro. was then called upon and he testified about the same things.— closed the examination of witnesses and bro. stood up on the part of the accuser and laid open the case handsomely and clearly. Bro stood up on the part of the accused, but could say but few words. [p. 38]
Page 38