Docket Entry, Judgment, 25 October 1837 [Rounds qui tam v. JS]

Home >
The Papers >

Introduction to Rounds qui tam v. JS Summons, 9 February 1837 [Rounds qui tam v. JS] Declaration, 22 April 1837 [Rounds qui tam v. JS] Docket Entry, Leave to Amend, 10 June 1837 [Rounds qui tam v. JS] Docket Entry, Costs, circa 10 June 1837 [Rounds qui tam v. JS] Docket Entry, Judgment, 25 October 1837 [Rounds qui tam v. JS] Docket Entry, Costs, circa 25 October 1837 [Rounds qui tam v. JS] Transcript of Proceedings, circa 25 October 1837 [Rounds qui tam v. JS] Assignment of Judgment, 1 March 1838 [Rounds qui tam v. JS]
Docket Entry, Judgment, 25 October 1837 [Rounds qui tam v. JS]
Source Note

Docket Entry, Judgment,
Chardon
Located eight miles south of Lake Erie and immediately east of Kirtland Township. Settled by 1812. Included village of Chardon. Population of township in 1820 about 430; in 1830 about 880; and in 1840 about 1,100. Two of JS’s sisters resided in township. ...
More Info
, Geauga Co., OH, 25 Oct. 1837, Rounds
qui tam
An action in qui tam imposes a statute-based penalty that rewards both the informant and the state by giving the “penalty in part to whosoever will sue for the same, and the other part to the commonwealth.”
View Glossary
v. JS (Geauga Co., OH, Court of Common Pleas 1837); Geauga County Court of Common Pleas, Journal, vol. N, p. 237; handwriting of Charles H. Foot and
David D. Aiken
20 Sept. 1794–12 Dec. 1861. County clerk, associate judge, merchant. Born in New York. Baptized into Episcopalian church, 9 Aug. 1818, in New York. Married Laura Loomis. Moved to Brown, Stark Co., Ohio, by 1820; to Painesville, Geauga Co., Ohio; and to Chardon...
View Full Bio
; Geauga County Archives and Records Center, Chardon, OH. Transcription from a digital color image made of the original in 2011.

Historical Introduction
See Introduction to Rounds qui tam v. JS.
Page 237
Hide editing marks

Charles H. Foot handwriting begins.
S[amuel] D. Rounds
ca. 1807–after 1887. Builder, brick mason, farmer. Born in Massachusetts. Son of John J. Rounds and Hannah. Married Amy Hatfield. Moved to New York, by 1830; and to Ohio, by 1834. Initiated legal actions against JS, Sidney Rigdon, and others involved in Kirtland...
View Full Bio

qui. tam
An action in qui tam imposes a statute-based penalty that rewards both the informant and the state by giving the “penalty in part to whosoever will sue for the same, and the other part to the commonwealth.”
View Glossary
. )

44 vs ) Debt—

Jos. Smith Jr. )

This day came the parties and thereupon came a Jury to wit: Guy Wyman, Caleb E. Cummings, John A. Ford, William Coafts, David Smith, George Patchin, Ira Webster, Stephen Hulbert, William B. C[a]rothers, Jason Manley, Joseph Emerson and Thomas King, who being duly empannelled & sworn, well & truly to try the issue joined between the parties, do find that the def[endan]t is indebted to the pl[ainti]ff in the sum of
Charles H. Foot handwriting ends; David D. Aiken begins.
one thousand dollars. It is therefore considered by the Court that the plff recover against the deft. the said sum of one thousand dollars, his debt aforesaid and also his costs. [p. 237]
View entire transcript
|
Cite this page
Source Note
Document Transcript
Page 237
Document Information
Related Case Documents
Editorial Title
Docket Entry, Judgment, 25 October 1837 [Rounds qui tam v. JS]
ID #
4515
Total Pages
1
Print Volume Location
Handwriting on This Page
Charles H. Foot
David D. Aiken
Footnotes
Charles H. Foot handwriting begins.
Charles H. Foot handwriting ends; David D. Aiken begins.