The Papers
Browse the PapersDocumentsJournalsAdministrative RecordsRevelations and TranslationsHistoriesLegal RecordsFinancial RecordsOther Contemporary Papers
Reference
PeoplePlacesEventsGlossaryLegal GlossaryFinancial GlossaryCalendar of DocumentsWorks CitedFeatured TopicsLesson PlansRelated Publications
Media
VideosPhotographsIllustrationsChartsMapsPodcasts
News
Current NewsArchiveNewsletterSubscribeJSP Conferences
About
About the ProjectJoseph Smith and His PapersFAQAwardsEndorsementsReviewsEditorial MethodNote on TranscriptionsNote on Images of People and PlacesReferencing the ProjectCiting This WebsiteProject TeamContact Us
Published Volumes
  1. Home > 
  2. The Papers > 

Council of Fifty, Minutes, March 1844–January 1846; Volume 2, 1 March–6 May 1845

1 March 1845 • Saturday, continued Page 1 4 March 1845 • Tuesday Page 32 11 March 1845 • Tuesday Page 77 18 March 1845 • Tuesday Page 131 22 March 1845 • Saturday Page 181 25 March 1845 • Tuesday Page 231 5 April 1845 • Saturday Page 266 11 April 1845 • Friday Page 267 15 April 1845 • Tuesday Page 327 22 April 1845 • Tuesday Page 349 29 April 1845 • Tuesday Page 355 6 May 1845 • Tuesday Page 361

Source Note

See source note under Council of Fifty, Minutes, March 1844–January 1846; Volume 1, 10 March 1844–1 March 1845.

Historical Introduction

See historical introduction under Council of Fifty, Minutes, March 1844–January 1846; Volume 1, 10 March 1844–1 March 1845.

Page [117]

write to us without delay, as a father and friend, and advise us what to do? We are, many of us, citizens of your state, and all members of the same great confederacy. Our fathers, nay, some of us, have fought and bled for our country; and we love her constitution dearly.
In the name of Israel’s God, and by virtue of multiplied ties of country and kindred, we ask your friendly interposition in our favor. Will it be too much to ask you to convene a special session of your State Legislature, and furnish us an asylum where we can enjoy our rights of conscience and religion unmolested? Or will you in a special message to that body, when convened, recommend a
remonstrance

A petition asking a court not to perform a contemplated action.

View Glossary
against such unhallowed acts of oppression and expatriation, as this people have continued to receive from the States of
Missouri

Area acquired by U.S. in Louisiana Purchase, 1803, and established as territory, 1812. Missouri Compromise, 1820, admitted Missouri as slave state, 1821. Population in 1830 about 140,000; in 1836 about 240,000; and in 1840 about 380,000. Latter-day Saint ...

More Info
and
Illinois

Became part of Northwest Territory of U.S., 1787. Admitted as state, 1818. Population in 1840 about 480,000. Population in 1845 about 660,000. Plentiful, inexpensive land attracted settlers from northern and southern states. Following expulsion from Missouri...

More Info
?
178

Only one governor is known to have followed through on these requests. Roger S. Baldwin of Connecticut, a Whig, forwarded the petition to the state legislature “in compliance with their request” but noted that he did not feel “that any legislation is required.” The proposal was then sent to the legislature’s Joint Committee on Federal Relations, which concurred with the governor: “They are not aware that any [legislation] is required to secure the enjoyment of these rights to any good Citizen who may seek the protection of our institutions.” (Roger S. Baldwin to Senate and House of Representatives of Connecticut, 29 May 1845; Report, 13 June 1845, in Brigham Young et al., Nauvoo, IL, to Roger S. Baldwin, “Hartford or New Haven,” CT, 30 Apr. 1845, photocopy, CHL.)


Comprehensive Works Cited

Young, Brigham, et al. Letter, Nauvoo, IL, to Roger S. Baldwin, “Hartford or New Haven,” CT, 30 Apr. 1845. Photocopy. CHL.

Or will [p. [117]]
View entire transcript

|

Cite this page

Source Note

Document Transcript

Page [117]

Document Information

Related Case Documents
Editorial Title
Council of Fifty, Minutes, March 1844–January 1846; Volume 2, 1 March–6 May 1845
ID #
11602
Total Pages
385
Print Volume Location
Handwriting on This Page
  • William Clayton

Footnotes

  1. [178]

    Only one governor is known to have followed through on these requests. Roger S. Baldwin of Connecticut, a Whig, forwarded the petition to the state legislature “in compliance with their request” but noted that he did not feel “that any legislation is required.” The proposal was then sent to the legislature’s Joint Committee on Federal Relations, which concurred with the governor: “They are not aware that any [legislation] is required to secure the enjoyment of these rights to any good Citizen who may seek the protection of our institutions.” (Roger S. Baldwin to Senate and House of Representatives of Connecticut, 29 May 1845; Report, 13 June 1845, in Brigham Young et al., Nauvoo, IL, to Roger S. Baldwin, “Hartford or New Haven,” CT, 30 Apr. 1845, photocopy, CHL.)

    Young, Brigham, et al. Letter, Nauvoo, IL, to Roger S. Baldwin, “Hartford or New Haven,” CT, 30 Apr. 1845. Photocopy. CHL.

© 2024 by Intellectual Reserve, Inc. All rights reserved.Terms of UseUpdated 2021-04-13Privacy NoticeUpdated 2021-04-06