Skip to main content

Report of United States Marshal, 24 January 1843 [United States v. Haws et al.]

  1. Home > 
  2. The Papers > 
Introduction to United States v. Haws et al. Promissory Note to Robert E. Lee, 10 September 1840, Nathaniel Childs Jr. Copy Promissory Note to Robert E. Lee, 10 September 1840, Charles B. Penrose Copy Summons, 25 April 1842 [United States v. Haws et al.] Declaration, circa 7 June 1842 [United States v. Haws et al.] Docket Entry, Judgment, 11 June 1842–30 January 1851 [United States v. Haws et al.] Transcript of Proceedings, circa 11 June 1842 [United States v. Haws et al.] Report of United States Attorney for District of Illinois, circa June 1842 [United States v. Haws et al.] Docket Entry, Fieri Facias, circa 18 July 1842 [United States v. Haws et al.] Report of United States Marshal, 22 July 1842 [U.S. v. Haws et al.] Report of United States Marshal, 24 January 1843 [United States v. Haws et al.] Report of United States Marshal, 23 January 1844 [United States v. Haws et al.]

Report of United States Marshal, 24 January 1843 [United States v. Haws et al.]

Source Note

, Report, [, Sangamon Co., IL], to Solicitor of the Treasury [Charles B. Penrose], [], 24 Jan. 1843, U.S. v. Haws et al. (U.S. District Court for the District of IL 1842); printed form with manuscript additions in unidentified handwriting; signature of ; one page; Case Files and Other Records Relating to Suits, 1791–1929, Records of the Solicitor of the Treasury, Record Group 206, National Archives and Records Administration, Washington DC; microfilm at CHL.

Historical Introduction

Page [1]

OFFICE OF THE MARSHAL OF THE UNITED STATES,
District of
24th day of January 1843
SIR:
I herewith report the following FINAL RETURNED at the December term of the Circuit <​and District​> Court of the United States for the —— District of , which ended on the 6th day of January 1843
Respectfully, yours,
U. S. Marshal for the —— District of .
To the Solicitor of the Treasury.
Note.—When the proceeding is in rem, state the thing seized, and the claimant’s name, (if known,) instead of the defendant. Cases arising out of the operations of the Post Office Department, are not to be included in the returns to the Solicitor.
DEFENDANT. FORM OF PROCESS. ON WHAT BROUGHT. NUMBER. DATE. AMOUNT OF JUDGMENT. DATE OF JUDGMENT. INTEREST. COSTS. WHEN RETURNED. NATURE OF RETURN. REMARKS.
Dollars. Cents. Dollars. Cents. Dollars. Cents.
[. . .]
, , Joseph Smith & Specialty 5 D. c. Sept 10 1840 5,184. 31 June 11. 1842 — — 28. 18¾ —— —— Writ <​not returned​> by Order of
[p. [1]]
View entire transcript

|

Cite this page

Source Note

Document Transcript

Page [1]

Document Information

Related Case Documents

United States v. Haws et al., 11 June 1842

Editorial Title
Report of United States Marshal, 24 January 1843 [United States v. Haws et al.]
ID #
5900
Total Pages
1
Print Volume Location
Handwriting on This Page
  • Printed text
  • Unidentified
  • William Prentiss

Footnotes

  1. new scribe logo

    Signature of William Prentiss.

  2. [1]

    TEXT: Other entries separate headings from the United States v. Haws et al. entry.