Skip to main content

Closing Argument of Josiah Lamborn, 28 May 1845 [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.]

  1. Home > 
  2. The Papers > 
Introduction to State of Illinois v. Williams et al. and State of Illinois v. Elliott–C Complaint, 22 September 1844 [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Warrant, 22 September 1844 [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Proclamation, 27 September 1844 [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Proclamation, 27 September 1844, as Published in Nauvoo Neighbor [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Agreement, 30 September 1844 [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Agreement, 30 September 1844, Copy [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Agreement, 2 October 1844 [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Agreement, 2 October 1844, Copy [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Agreement, 2 October 1844, as Published in Warsaw Signal [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Recognizance, 2 October 1844 [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Praecipe, 9 October 1844 [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Praecipe, 25 October 1844 [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Indictment, 26 October 1844 [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Indictment, 26 October 1844, Copy [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Docket Entry, Indictment, 26 October 1844 [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Praecipe, 26 October 1844 [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Docket Entry, Capias, 26 October 1844 [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Docket Entry, Discharge from Recognizance, 26 October 1844 [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Docket Entry, Recognizance, 26 October 1844 [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Memorandum of Testimony, circa 27 October 1844 [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Memorandum of Testimony, circa 27 October 1844, Copy [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Order, circa 19 November 1844 [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Warrant, 20 November 1844 [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Warrant, 20 November 1844, as Published in Reports [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Subpoena, 14 December 1844–A [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Subpoena, 14 December 1844–B [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Subpoena, 14 December 1844–C [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Subpoena, 14 December 1844–D [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Attachment, 14 December 1844 [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Bond, 20 March 1845 [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Subpoena, 8 May 1845 [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Bond, 17 May 1845 [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Praecipe, circa 18 May 1845 [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Subpoena, 19 May 1845 [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Docket Entry, Recognizance, 19 May 1845 [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Subpoena, 20 May 1845 [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Affidavit, 20–21 May 1845 [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Affidavit, 21 May 1845 [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Docket Entry, Motion, 21 May 1845 [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Docket Entry, Affidavits and Motions, 21 May 1845 [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Subpoena, 21 May 1845–A [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Subpoena, 21 May 1845–B [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Account of Trial, 21–28 May 1845, Shorthand [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Account of Trial, 21–28 May 1845, Longhand [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Oath, 22 May 1845 [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Subpoena, 22 May 1845–A [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Subpoena, 22 May 1845–B [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Subpoena, 22 May 1845–C [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Subpoena, 22 May 1845–D [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Subpoena, 22 May 1845–E [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Venire Facias, 22 May 1845 [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Instructions for Jury Selection, 22 May 1845 [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Alias Venire Facias, 22 May 1845 [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Docket Entry, Writs of Venire Facias, 22 May 1845 [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Attachment, 23 May 1845 [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Subpoena, 23 May 1845–A [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Subpoena, 23 May 1845–B [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Subpoena, 23 May 1845–C [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Subpoena, 23 May 1845–D [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Docket Entry, Pluries Venire Facias, 23 May 1845 [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Attachment, 24 May 1845–A [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Attachment, 24 May 1845–B [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Attachment, 24 May 1845–C [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Subpoena, 24 May 1845 [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Docket Entry, Motion Withdrawn, 24 May 1845 [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Docket Entry, Attachments, 24 May 1845 [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Docket Entry, Continuance, 24 May 1845 [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Account of Trial, 24–28 May 1845–A [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Account of Trial, 24–28 May 1845–A, as Published in Trial of the Persons Indicted [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Account of Trial, 24–28 May 1845–B [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Subpoena, 26 May 1845 [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Docket Entry, Continuance, 26 May 1845 [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Attachment, 27 May 1845 [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Subpoena, 27 May 1845–A [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Subpoena, 27 May 1845–B [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Docket Entry, Continuance, 27 May 1845 [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Closing Argument of Josiah Lamborn, 28 May 1845 [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Closing Argument of Calvin A. Warren, 28 May 1845 [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Closing Argument of Calvin A. Warren, 28 May 1845, as Recorded in “Minutes of Trial” [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Docket Entry, Continuance, 28 May 1845 [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Docket Entry, Continuance, 29 May 1845 [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Closing Argument of Onias Skinner, 29 May 1845 [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Closing Argument of Onias Skinner, 29 May 1845, Copy [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Closing Argument of Orville Browning, 29 May 1845 [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Jury Instructions, 30 May 1845 [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Verdict, 30 May 1845 [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Docket Entry, Verdict, 30 May 1845 [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Docket Entry, Attachment, 30 May 1845–A [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.] Docket Entry, Attachment, 30 May 1845–B [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.]

Closing Argument of Josiah Lamborn, 28 May 1845 [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.]

Source Note

, Closing Argument, [, Hancock Co., IL, 28 May 1845], State of IL v. Williams et al. (Hancock Co., IL, Circuit Court 1845). Copied [between ca. 11 Feb. 1944 and ca. 16 Jan. 1968] in “Minutes of Trial of Members of Mob Who Helped Kill Joseph Smith, the Prophet,” pp. 21–22 (first numbering); CHL.
The custodial history of this typescript is unknown. Wilford C. Wood acquired the manuscript from Frank C. Baum in 1944 and thereafter created three typescript transcripts of it. Two of the transcripts, identified as a first copy and a carbon copy, were retained by Wood and are in the possession of the Wilford C. Wood Museum in Bountiful, Utah. At an unknown time, Wood created a third transcript titled “Minutes of Trial of Members of Mob who Helped Kill Joseph Smith, the Prophet” that was donated to the Church Historian’s Office before Wood’s death in 1968. The transcripts contain portions that are unaccounted for in the manuscript. The copy donated to the church is virtually identical to the copies at the Wood Museum, except that some of the documents are in a different order. The typescript was presumably placed in a Joseph Smith name file after its donation. Church Historical Department (now CHL) staff cataloged the typescript in 1973.

Footnotes

  1. [1]

    Mrs. Frank Baum, Quincy, IL, to Wilford C. Wood, Woods Cross, UT, Receipt, 11 Feb. 1944, microfilm, reel 16, Wilford C. Wood Collection of Church Historical Materials, CHL; Letter, Wilford C. Wood, Woods Cross, UT, to David O. McKay, 16 Feb. 1944, microfilm, reel 16, Wilford C. Wood Collection of Church Historical Materials, CHL.

    Wilford C. Wood Collection of Church Historical Materials. Microfilm. CHL. MS 8617.

  2. [2]

    See “Martyrdom Court Records (typed) carbon 4-c-b-2.2,” microfilm, reel 5, Wilford C. Wood Collection of Church Historical Materials, CHL; and “Martyrdom Court Records (Typed) 4-c-b-2.4,” microfilm, reel 25, Wilford C. Wood Collection of Church Historical Materials, CHL.

    Wilford C. Wood Collection of Church Historical Materials. Microfilm. CHL. MS 8617.

  3. [3]

    “Rites Held for Wilford C. Wood,” Davis County Clipper, 26 Jan. 1968, [12]. This title page is not included in the other typescripts.

    Davis County Clipper. Bountiful, UT. 1892–.

  4. [4]

    See the full bibliographic entry for “Minutes of Trial of Members of Mob Who Helped Kill Joseph Smith, 1844–1845,” in the CHL catalog; and Oaks and Hill, Carthage Conspiracy, 227.

    Oaks, Dallin H., and Marvin S. Hill. Carthage Conspiracy: The Trial of the Accused Assassins of Joseph Smith. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1975.

Historical Introduction

Page 21

Go to next page 2
Wednesday, 2½ P. M.— Spoke 1½ hrs.
Is a stranger— has had to manage case alone.
It was supposed in that this trial would progress under military law. have been filed with See pamphlet, Newspaper and attempts in prejudice trial.
This trial will have effect to tranquilize the public mind.
Is not seeking the blood of these men against the law.
[William] Daniels, one of the material witnesses in this case, was no doubt in town when Smith was killed.
No doubt the substantial features of his evidence are true, but he has made statements which ought to his evidence before any court.
And has written a ridiculous and lying book, and it is impossible to rely upon his testimony. Ans. Daniels has not even the plea of a blinded faith— is an unmixed hypocrite— faith-fanatic faith.
I acquit Mormons, def[endan]ts. and all of attempting to bribe him.
His book is a tissue from falsehoods from beginning to end.
I could get along with the [blank] and the ox without a heart.
I intend to be fair and candid and therefore exclude Daniels evidence from the consideration of the jury.
was drunk, is a loafer and perjured himself before the grand jury.
I am satisfied that his evidence can be successfully impeached and therefore withdraw it from the jury.
Miss [Eliza] Graham, I am sincerely of the opinion that she spoke the truth, and that the other witnesses were mistaken.
But she is contradicted and I therefore give her up, but am sure that she has not been influenced by the Mormons— that they have made no effort to procure improper evidence.
I have no doubt in my own mind, not a particle, that cooperated in the murder, but there is no legal evidence to convict him.
Nor is there evidence to convict Capt. [William] Grover, altho I verily believe he was at the jail with his gun.
The murder of the Smiths was an act of damnable infamy— cowardly in the extreme— and the world so regards it.
I am not the champion of the Smiths, or the Mormons — I am the champion of no party.
The crime was committed, and by the men who came from the railroad shantees. We trace them from there to , and back to .
We did not ask that a Mormon should be put upon the jury. We use no Mormon witness, but throw ourselves upon the magnanimity of the jury.
— was in town the morning the murder was committed, and opposed disbanding the troops, and fanning the flame of rebellion and mobocracy.
The had called out the troops to suppress a civil war — they had been discharged and inflamed them at the railroad.
Not bound to prove that these men struck the blow, or were at the jail.
Circumstantial evidence is the most conclusive — and the evidence in this case tends to convict the defendants. [p. 21]
View entire transcript

|

Cite this page

Source Note

Document Transcript

Page 21

Go to next page 2

Document Information

Related Case Documents

State of Illinois v. Williams et al., Hancock Co., IL, Circuit Court, 30 May 1845

Editorial Title
Closing Argument of Josiah Lamborn, 28 May 1845 [State of Illinois v. Williams et al.]
ID #
20271
Total Pages
2
Print Volume Location
Handwriting on This Page
  • Printed text
Go to page