Letter from Myron Higley and Others, circa 16 September 1842
Source Note
, , , and , Letter, [Boonville, Oneida Co.,] NY, to JS and , , Hancock Co., IL, [ca. 16 Sept. 1842]; unidentified handwriting; four pages; JS Collection (Supplement), CHL. Includes address, postal notations, and dockets.
Bifolium measuring 12¼ × 8 inches (31 × 20 cm) when folded. Each page is ruled with thirty-five horizontal printed lines. The minutes of a 12 January 1842 branch conference referred to in the letter are inscribed on the first three pages. The letter begins at the bottom of the third page and continues onto the fourth page. The document was trifolded twice in letter style, addressed, and sealed with a red adhesive wafer.
The minutes and letter were presumably received in , Illinois, in late 1842. The document was docketed by , who served as scribe to JS from 1842 to 1844. Another docket was inscribed by , who served as a clerk in the Church Historian’s Office (later Church Historical Department) from 1853 to 1859. Andrew Jenson, who began working in the Church Historian’s Office in 1891 and served as assistant church historian from 1897 to 1941, added to the Hawkins docket. The document is part of the JS Collection Supplement at the Church Historical Department (now CHL). The Church Historical Department published a register of the JS Collection in 1973. Between 1974 and 1984, staff continued to locate documents authored by or directed to JS in uncataloged church financial records and in name and subject files. The department also acquired additional JS documents from donors, collectors, and dealers. These newly located and acquired documents were kept together in a supplement to the JS Collection. A preliminary inventory of the supplement was created in 1992. This group of records was named the JS Collection (Supplement), 1833–1844, and its cataloging was finalized in 2017. The minutes and letter have presumably been in continuous institutional custody.
JS, Journal, 29 June 1842; “Clayton, William,” in Jenson, Latter-day Saint Biographical Encyclopedia, 1:718.
Jenson, Andrew. Latter-day Saint Biographical Encyclopedia: A Compilation of Biographical Sketches of Prominent Men and Women in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. 4 vols. Salt Lake City: Andrew Jenson History Co., 1901–1936.
Jenson, Autobiography, 192, 389; Cannon, Journal, 9 Feb. 1891; Jenson, Journal, 9 Feb. 1891 and 19 Oct. 1897; Bitton and Arrington, Mormons and Their Historians, 47–52.
Jenson, Andrew. Autobiography of Andrew Jenson: Assistant Historian of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. . . . Salt Lake City: Deseret News Press, 1938.
Cannon, George Q. Journals, 1855–1864, 1872–1901. CHL. CR 850 1.
Jenson, Andrew. Journals, 1864–1941. Andrew Jenson, Autobiography and Journals, 1864–1941. CHL.
Bitton, David, and Leonard J. Arrington. Mormons and Their Historians. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, 1988.
See the full bibliographic entry for JS Collection (Supplement), 1833–1844, in the CHL catalog.
Historical Introduction
Around 16 September 1842, members , , , and wrote a letter from Boonville, New York, to JS and in , Illinois, asking their opinion about a recent disciplinary action. The letter was added to the bottom of the minutes of the proceedings of a case against Nancy Thomas Chase, who had been charged with stealing money from other members of the Boonville .
Several branch members accused Chase of stealing money from their pockets while they slept at Chase’s home. On 12 January 1842, Chase’s case was heard by a council presided over by . He was joined by , , , and other branch members, including Chase’s husband, . Tibbals, who claimed that a three-dollar bill had been taken from him, testified that he had awoken and found Nancy Chase with “his pantaloons in her hand from the pocket of which the bill was taken, & that she was taking her hand from the pocket at the time he saw her.” In answering the charges, she reportedly stated that “she had no knowledge or recollection of the transactions which were alleged against her, although she might have taken the things without knowing it, & that she did not believe that the Brethren would lie about her” and that “she hoped they would forgive her, & she would refund the money if she was ever able.” Justus Chase then stated that on several occasions he had “known sister Chase to be so far deranged as to deprive her of all knowledge of her own conduct.” Following a discussion of the case, it was moved that Nancy Chase’s “acknowledgement . . . be accepted by the & that she be forgiven,” and the motion carried.
Some members, however, were dissatisfied with the decision to forgive Chase, so the case was referred to a conference held in Utica, New York, on 11 June 1842. The Utica conference recommended that the Boonville branch “institute a new trial in the case of Sister Chase.” Accordingly, the new trial was held on 2 July 1842 at the home of in Port Leyden, New York, about seven miles north of Boonville. It is unclear whether Nancy or attended this second hearing, but because the same evidence was presented as in the first hearing and “there was no one to speak for Sister Chase,” the charges against her were sustained and a motion carried that she “be excluded from the Church.” The Chases were unhappy with the result of the second hearing and requested that send the proceedings to JS for his consideration. Higley and other branch members sent the minutes of the most recent proceedings to JS and requested that he send back his response as a written revelation. The minutes are not a JS document, but because they were included with the letter sent to JS and Hyrum Smith, they are included here.
and company presumably wrote the letter on or shortly before 16 September 1842, the date given in the letter’s manuscript postmark. Aware from newspaper reports that JS had left in August to elude authorities seeking to arrest him and extradite him to , they mailed the letter from , New York, to in Nauvoo and asked him to act in JS’s place if JS was not able to attend to their request. The letter likely arrived in Nauvoo in early October 1842, but it is unclear when either JS or Hyrum Smith received it. It is likewise unclear if any decision was made regarding Nancy Chase and her membership in the church.
It is unclear what specific reports Higley and the other members of the Boonville branch had read, but news of the attempts to arrest JS and extradite him to Missouri appeared in several newspapers published in western New York. (See, for example, “The Mormons,” and “No Arrest,” Auburn [NY] Journal and Advertiser, 7 Sept. 1842, [3].)
Auburn Journal and Advertiser. Auburn, NY. 1834–1848.
Page [2]
to deprive her of all knowledge of her own conduct. after discusing the foregoing allegations & the circumstances attending the transaction of the same, it was moved by the & Seconded by Sister Cynthia Burr that the acknowledgement offered by Sister Chase be accepted by the & that she be forgiven. Carried
Prest
Clerk
After the above proceedings of the Conference some of the Brethren & sisters became dissatisfied with their own decision of the foregoing case, from the consideration that it was decided according to the advice of , instead of being decided according to the evidence ( having at the time advised the Conference to forgive Sister Chase & said it was their duty to do so. In conseqence of the aforesaid dissatisfaction the Case was reported at the Conference held in Utica in June 1842 & the Conference ordered that the should institute a new trial in the case of Sister Chase. agreeable to the above order a Conference of the branch was convend agreeable to notice on the 2d of July 1842 at the house of in Leyden, & was opened by singing & a prayer by the .
A request in writing was presented to the Branch from Brother & Sister Nancy Chase that she Sister Nancy Chase might be cut off from the , by the Brethren & Sisters withdrawing the hand of fellowship from her. the request was signed by & Sister Chase. After a few remarks by the in opposition to granting the request of & Sister Chase. It was moved by & seconded by Brother Russel Cornwell that Sister Nancy Chase have a trial for the charges <that were> alleged against her. which were then prefered against her by teacher in the following words (viz) Whereas certain Individuals have lost money at the house of Brother and whereas you, Sister Nancy Chase are suspected as being the person who took said money. Therefore we do hereby request you to appear at the house [p. [2]]