Skip to main content

Letter from William Perkins, 29 October 1838

  1. Home > 
  2. The Papers > 

Letter from William Perkins, 29 October 1838

Source Note

, Letter, , Geauga Co., OH, to JS, , Caldwell Co., MO, 29 Oct. 1838; handwriting of ; two pages; JS Collection, CHL. Includes enclosures.
Single leaf measuring 6⅛ × 8 inches (16 × 20 cm), with nineteen printed lines per page. The top edge was apparently hand cut, whereas the other edges have the square cut of manufactured paper. The leaf was folded for transmission or filing. Docketing by on one of the enclosures indicates the letter and the enclosure—a statement of account for JS and other church members—was added to JS’s office papers in , Illinois, as early as 1842, suggesting continuous institutional custody thereafter.

Footnotes

  1. [1]

    See Source Note for Statement of Account from Perkins & Osborn, ca. 29 Oct. 1838. Clayton served as a clerk and scribe for JS in Nauvoo from 1842 to 1844. (Clayton, Diary, 10 Feb. 1842; Clayton, History of the Nauvoo Temple, 18, 30–31; JS, Journal, 29–30 June 1842.)

    Clayton, William. Diary, Vol. 1, 1840–1842. BYU.

    Clayton, William. History of the Nauvoo Temple, ca. 1845. CHL. MS 3365.

Historical Introduction

On 29 October 1838, of the law firm Perkins & Osborn wrote a letter to JS to introduce account statements listing unpaid legal fees and other debts. Perkins and his law partner, , began providing legal advice to JS and other church members, as well as defending them in several lawsuits, in 1837. Perkins and Osborn continued to act as JS’s attorneys after his January 1838 move to .
In this letter to JS, mentioned that he was aware of the conflict between the and other residents; that he had been in contact with and , both of whom acted as for JS and the church to pay debts in , Ohio; and that he had prepared an account statement at Granger’s request. Perkins also asked that his fees be paid, and he explained how he calculated the charges for representing JS, , , , , and in the lawsuits that brought against the men in 1837 for issuing notes from the unincorporated . The cases against Whitney, Williams, Kingsbury, and Parrish were dismissed before coming to trial, whereas JS and Rigdon were tried in absentia in October 1837, found guilty, and fined $1,000 each. Because the legal representation and fees varied by case, Perkins noted that he charged each individual based on the proportion of time he spent on a case. By 1838 Kingsbury had become disaffected from the church and Parrish had been excommunicated; both remained in , Ohio. As a result, Perkins did not include their fees in JS’s account statement.
’s letter to JS was accompanied by several enclosures. One enclosure was the account statement listing the debts of JS and other church members to the law firm Perkins & Osborn. This account statement also includes information on several outstanding promissory notes that merchants asked Perkins & Osborn to collect payment on. Perkins’s letter also mentions enclosures, apparently not extant, intended for and .
It is unknown how the letter was transmitted or when JS received it. Neither the letter nor the account statement bears addressing or other postal markings, but a wrapper, now missing, may have. JS was taken into state custody on 31 October 1838 in , Missouri, and remained imprisoned until April 1839. While JS was imprisoned, apparently kept the letter and account statement. The filing docket indicates that JS eventually received the documents, perhaps when Granger and JS were both in in spring 1839.

Footnotes

  1. [1]

    See Declaration to the Geauga County Court of Common Pleas, 7 May 1838.

  2. [2]

    Marks and Granger began acting as agents for JS in 1837 and continued in that capacity during 1838. (See Historical Introduction to Deed to William Marks, 10 Apr. 1837; Historical Introduction to Notice, ca. Late Aug. 1837; Pay Order to Edward Partridge for William Smith, 21 Feb. 1838; and Revelation, 8 July 1838–E [D&C 117].)

  3. [3]

    For more on Rounds’s lawsuits, see Introduction to Part 5: 5 Oct. 1836–10 Apr. 1837.

  4. [4]

    Transcripts of Proceedings, 24 Oct. 1837, Rounds v. Parrish; Rounds v. Williams; Rounds v. Whitney; Rounds v. Kingsbury; Rounds v. Rigdon; Rounds v. JS (Geauga Co. C.P. 1837), Final Record Book U, pp. 353–364, microfilm 20,279, U.S. and Canada Record Collection, FHL.

  5. [5]

    Kingsbury apparently became disaffected and distanced himself from the church in 1837. Parrish was excommunicated in late December 1837. (JS History, vol. B-1, 767; Vilate Murray Kimball, Kirtland, OH, to Heber C. Kimball, Preston, England, ca. 10–12 Sept. 1837, Heber C. Kimball, Collection, CHL; John Smith and Clarissa Lyman Smith, Kirtland, OH, to George A. Smith, Shinnston, VA, 1 Jan. 1838, George Albert Smith, Papers, CHL.)

    Kimball, Heber C. Collection, 1837–1898. CHL. MS 12476.

    Smith, George Albert. Papers, 1834–1877. CHL. MS 1322.

  6. [6]

    On 1 September 1837, Perkins apparently oversaw the negotiations between New York mercantile firms and JS and his associates. The New York firms had sold wholesale goods to the Kirtland-area mercantile firms Rigdon, Smith & Cowdery and Cahoon, Carter & Co. The Kirtland firms provided promissory notes as payment but were unable to pay many of the notes when they became due. (See William Perkins, Painesville, OH, to Reuben McBride, 23 July 1867, copy, in Franklin D. Richards, Liverpool, England, to Brigham Young, 27 Aug. 1867, Brigham Young Office Files, CHL; and Historical Introduction to Power of Attorney to Oliver Granger, 27 Sept. 1837; see also Statement of Account from Perkins & Osborn, ca. 29 Oct. 1838.)

    Brigham Young Office Files, 1832–1878. CHL. CR 1234 1.

  7. [7]

    See Introduction to Part 3: 4 Nov. 1838–16 Apr. 1839.

Page [1]

Go to next page 2
Oct 29. 1838
Joseph Smith Jr Esq
Dea[r] Sir
At Suggestion of our friend we send you Statement of our acct & demnds— You know I threw my whole influence, industry & whatever talents I have faithfully into your affairs— do something for me, “The labourer is worthy of his hire”
In the Quis tam Suits of Rounds, we have charged the differ[e]nt individuals according as we thought was about right in proportion to our Services— I spent a great deal of time & labour in my office in those suits, & though unsuccessfull it was no fault of ours you know. rebelled & we have a judgt against him for his proportion & presume it will be collected—
I have heard much of your troubles & take an interest in your welfare & believed you must [p. [1]]
View entire transcript

|

Cite this page

Source Note

Document Transcript

Page [1]

Go to next page 2

Document Information

Related Case Documents
Editorial Title
Letter from William Perkins, 29 October 1838
ID #
417
Total Pages
2
Print Volume Location
JSP, D6:249–251
Handwriting on This Page
  • William Perkins

Footnotes

  1. [1]

    Luke 10:7.

  2. [2]

    Parrish apparently had not paid his portion of the legal fees in the Rounds lawsuits. To obtain Parrish’s payment, Perkins & Osborn brought a claim against him, likely through the justice of the peace court since the debt was small—under one hundred dollars.

  3. [3]

    Ohio newspapers published several articles referencing the Missouri situation. (See, for example, “The Mormons,” Daily Herald and Gazette [Cleveland, OH], 13 Sept. 1838, [2]; “Mormon Difficulties,” Daily Herald and Gazette, 10 Oct. 1838, [2]; and “Mormon Campaign,” Painesville [OH] Republican, 11 Oct. 1838, [1].)

    Daily Herald and Gazette. Cleveland. 1837–1839.

    Painesville Republican. Painesville, OH. 1836–1841.

Go to page