Motion, circa 15 May 1843–A [City of Nauvoo v. Davis for Slander of JS–C]

  • Source Note
  • Historical Introduction
Page [1]
image
on appeal— No. 77 <​76​>—
vs <​ats [ad sectam]​>)
City of
The said by his attorney moves the Court to dismiss this suit for the reasons following, to wit; 1st because the court below had no jurisdiction of said case—
2nd because said cause was instituted by without any law or ordinance whatever to support
3rd because said prosecution was set on foot contrary to the constitution & laws of the & of this
[C. O.] Warner
P. D [pro defendente]— [p. [1]]
on appeal— No. 76—
ats [ad sectam])
City of
The said by his attorney moves the Court to dismiss this suit for the reasons following, to wit; 1st because the court below had no jurisdiction of said case—
2nd because said cause was instituted without any law or ordinance whatever to support
3rd because said prosecution was set on foot contrary to the constitution & laws of the & of this
C. O. Warner
P. D [pro defendente]— [p. [1]]
Page [1]