Motion, circa 15 May 1843 [City of Nauvoo v. Davis for Assault]

  • Source Note
  • Historical Introduction
Page [1]
image
ats [ad sectam]) on appeal
City of
<​No. 75​>
The by his atty moves the Court to dismiss this suit for the reasons following to wit;
1st because said suit was instituted an under an ordinance contrary to the constitution & laws of the & of this
2nd Because said Case is unsupported by law, ordinance &c—
[C. O.] Warner P. D. [pro defendente]— [p. [1]]
ats ad sectam) on appeal
City of
No. 75
The by his atty moves the Court to dismiss this suit for the reasons following to wit;
1st because said suit was instituted under an ordinance contrary to the constitution & laws of the & of this
2nd Because said Case is unsupported by law, ordinance &c—
[C. O.] Warner P. D. [pro defendente]— [p. [1]]
Page [1]