1. Home >
  2. The Papers >
  3. >
Introduction to State of Illinois v. Finch, State of Illinois v. Finch on Habeas Corpus, and Davis v. JS et al. Praecipe, circa 22 February 1844 [Davis v. JS et al.] Praecipe, 23 February 1844 [Davis v. JS et al.] Summons, 24 February 1844 [Davis v. JS et al.] Subpoena, 24 February 1844–A [Davis v. JS et al.] Subpoena, 24 February 1844–B [Davis v. JS et al.] Subpoena, 24 February 1844–C [Davis v. JS et al.] Notice, 9 April 1844 [Davis v. JS et al.] Notice, 9 April 1844, Copy [Davis v. JS et al.] Docket Entry, Leave to Plead, 21 May 1844 [Davis v. JS et al.] Pleas, circa 22 May 1844 [Davis v. JS et al.] Demurrer, circa 22 May 1844 [Davis v. JS et al.] Attachment, 23 May 1844 [Davis v. JS et al.] Docket Entry, Plea, 23 May 1844 [Davis v. JS et al.] Docket Entry, Motion and Change of Venue, 23 May 1844 [Davis v. JS et al.] Case File Wrapper, circa May 1844 [Davis v. JS et al.] Affidavit, 6 August 1844 [Davis v. JS et al.] Motion, circa 6 August 1844 [Davis v. JS et al.] Docket Entry, Notification of Death and Dismissal, 21 October 1844 [Davis v. JS et al.] Docket Entry, Fee Bill, between 22 November 1844 and circa 20 February 1845 [Davis v. JS et al.] Praecipe, 25 February 1845 [Davis v. JS et al.] Docket Entry, Alias Fee Bill, between 29 March and circa 7 July 1845 [Davis v. JS et al.] Docket Entry, circa 7 July 1845 [Davis v. JS et al.]

Pleas, circa 22 May 1844 [Davis v. JS et al.]

  • Source Note
  • Historical Introduction
Page [2]
image
the aforesaid defendants were acting and forming appart of of said Judiciary Municipal Court and the the said judgment was in due form of law at l◊◊◊◊ for the li◊◊ and that said aforesaid was issued uppon said judgment aforesaid and directed to who was then Marshall of of said and that the said aforesaid by virtue of said execution levyed appon and sold apart of said property set forth in the declaratio[n] to the amont of said execution and this the <​said​> defendnts are ready to verify wherefore they pray Judgment if said ought further to have or to maintain his aforesaid action thereof against them
Attor[ne]y for Defts [p. [2]]
the aforesaid defendants were acting and forming appart of said Municipal Court and the said judgment was in due form of law and that said aforesaid was issued uppon said judgment aforesaid and directed to who was then Marshall of of said and that the said aforesaid by virtue of said execution levyed appon and sold apart of said property set forth in the declaration to the amont of said execution and this the said defendnts are ready to verify wherefore they pray Judgment if said ought further to have or to maintain his aforesaid action thereof against them
Attorney for Defts [p. [2]]
View entire transcript |
Cite this page
Cite this page
Page [2]
2
Contact Us FAQ Follow Us on Facebook

Request for Documents

Do you know of any Joseph Smith documents that we might not have heard about? Tell us

The Church Historian’s Press is an imprint of the Church History Department of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Salt Lake City, Utah, and a trademark of Intellectual Reserve, Inc.

© 2022 by Intellectual Reserve, Inc. All rights reserved. Terms of Use Updated 2021-04-13 | Privacy Notice Updated 2021-04-06 |