Introduction to Hibbard for the use of Hungerford & Livingston v. Miller and JS
- Home >
- The Papers >
Introduction to Hibbard for the use of Hungerford & Livingston v. Miller and JS
Page
1840 (1)
1840 (1)
May (1)
May (1)
George Miller and JS, Promissory Note, Nauvoo, Hancock Co., IL, to Davidson Hibbard, Nauvoo, Hancock Co., IL
- 11 May 1840; photocopy at CHL; handwriting of George Miller; signatures of George Miller and JS.
1840 (3)
1840 (3)
November (2)
November (2)
Samuel Marshall, Summons, to Any Hancock Co. Constable, for George Miller and JS, Carthage, Hancock Co., IL
- 27 Nov. 1840; microfilm in Circuit Court Case Files, 1830–1900, CHL; printed form with manuscript additions in handwriting of Samuel Marshall; docket and notations printed with manuscript additions in handwriting of Samuel Marshall; notation printed with manuscript additions in handwriting of Harmon T. Wilson. [3587]
William D. Abernethy, Bond, Hancock Co., IL
- 27 Nov. 1840; microfilm in Circuit Court Case Files, 1830–1900, CHL; handwriting of Samuel Marshall; signature of William D. Abernethy; docket and notation in handwriting of Samuel Marshall.
December (1)
December (1)
Docket Entry, Carthage, Hancock Co., IL
- 27 Nov.–5 Dec. 1840. Not extant.
- 26 Apr. 1841; microfilm in Circuit Court Case Files, 1830–1900, CHL; handwriting of Samuel Marshall; docket and notation in handwriting of S. Otho Williams.
1841 (2)
1841 (2)
June (1)
June (1)
Fieri Facias, Carthage, Hancock Co., IL
- 25 June 1841. Not extant.
September (1)
September (1)
Fee Bill, Carthage, Hancock Co., IL
- Ca. Sept. 1841; Hancock County Circuit Court, Fee Book E, p. 157, Hancock County Courthouse, Carthage, IL; handwriting of Matthias Avise.
1840 (5)
1840 (5)
December (5)
December (5)
Docket Entry, Copy, Carthage, Hancock Co., IL
- 26 Apr. 1841; microfilm in Circuit Court Case Files, 1830–1900, CHL; handwriting of Samuel Marshall; docket and notation in handwriting of S. Otho Williams.
Judgment, Carthage, Hancock Co., IL
- 14 Dec. 1840; microfilm in Circuit Court Case Files, 1830–1900, CHL; handwriting of Samuel Marshall; docket in handwriting of Samuel Marshall; notation in handwriting of S. Otho Williams.
George Miller and Others, Hancock Co., IL, Bond, to Davidson Hibbard, Hancock Co., IL
- 21 Dec. 1840; microfilm in Circuit Court Case Files, 1830–1900, CHL; printed form with manuscript additions in handwriting of S. Otho Williams; signatures of George Miller, Amos Davis Jr., and Alanson Ripley; docket and notation printed with manuscript additions in handwriting of S. Otho Williams.
S. Otho Williams, Supersedeas, to Samuel Marshall, Carthage, Hancock Co., IL
- 21 Dec. 1840; microfilm in Circuit Court Case Files, 1830–1900, CHL; printed form with manuscript additions in handwriting of S. Otho Williams; docket printed with manuscript additions in handwriting of S. Otho Williams; notations printed with manuscript additions in handwriting of William D. Abernethy.
S. Otho Williams, Summons, to Hancock Co. Sheriff, for Davidson Hibbard, Carthage, Hancock Co., IL
- 21 Dec. 1840; microfilm in Circuit Court Case Files, 1830–1900, CHL; printed form with manuscript additions in handwriting of S. Otho Williams; docket printed with manuscript additions in handwriting of S. Otho Williams; notations printed with manuscript additions in handwriting of Harmon T. Wilson.
1841 (2)
1841 (2)
May (1)
May (1)
Docket Entry, Judgment, Carthage, Hancock Co., IL
- 8 May 1841; Hancock County Circuit Court Record, vol. C, p. 99, Hancock County Courthouse, Carthage, IL; microfilm at FHL; unidentified handwriting.
September (1)
September (1)
Docket Entry, Carthage, Hancock Co., IL
- Between 25 June and ca. 3 Sept. 1841; Hancock County Circuit Court, Execution Docket, vol. A, p. [89], Hancock County Courthouse, Carthage, IL; image in Hancock County Papers, 1830–1872, CHL; handwriting of S. Otho Williams.
Source Note
Source Note
Document Transcript
Page
Document Information
Document Information
- Related Case Documents
- Editorial Title
- Introduction to Hibbard for the use of Hungerford & Livingston v. Miller and JS
- ID #
- 17252
- Total Pages
- 1
- Print Volume Location
- Handwriting on This Page
Footnotes
Footnotes
- [1]
William S. Hungerford and Richard M. Livingston were “wholesale dealers in drygoods, boots and shoes” in St. Louis. (Keemle, St. Louis Directory, for the Years 1840–1, 28; Dunn, St. Croix, 80.)
Keemle, Charles. The St. Louis Directory, for the Years 1840–1: Containing the Names of the Inhabitants, Their Occupations, and the Numbers of Their Places of Business and Dwellings; With a Sketch of the City of St. Louis. . . . St. Louis: By the author, 1840.
Dunn, James Taylor. Marine on St. Croix: From Lumber Village to Summer Haven. Marine on St. Croix, MN: Marine Historical Society, 1968.
- [2]
- [3]
An Act concerning Justices of the Peace and Constables [3 Feb. 1827], Public and General Statute Laws of the State of Illinois [1834–1837], p. 402, sec. 1. The $0.81 presumably represented interest. Extant documents do not indicate the common law action employed by Hibbard.
The Public and General Statute Laws of the State of Illinois: Containing All the Laws . . . Passed by the Ninth General Assembly, at Their First Session, Commencing December 1, 1834, and Ending February 13, 1835; and at Their Second Session, Commencing December 7, 1835, and Ending January 18, 1836; and Those Passed by the Tenth General Assembly, at Their Session Commencing December 5, 1836, and Ending March 6, 1837; and at Their Special Session, Commencing July 10, and Ending July 22, 1837. . . . Compiled by Jonathan Young Scammon. Chicago: Stephen F. Gale, 1839.
- [4]
- [5]
Scammon, Reports of Cases, 2:[xi]–[xii]; Hancock Co., IL, Circuit Court Records, vol. C, p. [1], microfilm 947,496, U.S. and Canada Record Collection, FHL.
Scammon / Scammon, J. Young. Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of the State of Illinois. 4 vols. St. Louis: W. J. Gilbert, 1869–1870.
U.S. and Canada Record Collection. FHL.
- [6]
Docket Entry, Judgment, 8 May 1841 [Hibbard for the use of Hungerford and Livingston v. Miller and JS]. When a party appealed a case and the appellate court affirmed the judgment of the lower court on all counts, it suggested the appeal either had no merit or was filed so that the defendant could delay the penalty. If the judge felt the appeal “was prosecuted for delay,” he could assess damages not to exceed 10 percent of the amount of the judgment. (An Act concerning Costs [10 Jan. 1827], Public and General Statute Laws of the State of Illinois [1834–1837], p. 198, sec. 19.)
The Public and General Statute Laws of the State of Illinois: Containing All the Laws . . . Passed by the Ninth General Assembly, at Their First Session, Commencing December 1, 1834, and Ending February 13, 1835; and at Their Second Session, Commencing December 7, 1835, and Ending January 18, 1836; and Those Passed by the Tenth General Assembly, at Their Session Commencing December 5, 1836, and Ending March 6, 1837; and at Their Special Session, Commencing July 10, and Ending July 22, 1837. . . . Compiled by Jonathan Young Scammon. Chicago: Stephen F. Gale, 1839.
- [7]