Letter from Lyman Wight and Heber C. Kimball, 19, 21, and 24 June 1844
Letter from Lyman Wight and Heber C. Kimball, 19, 21, and 24 June 1844
Source Note
Source Note
Footnotes
Jessee, “Writing of Joseph Smith’s History,” 456, 458; Woodruff, Journal, 22 Jan. 1865.
Jessee, Dean C. “The Writing of Joseph Smith’s History.” BYU Studies 11 (Summer 1971): 439–473.
Woodruff, Wilford. Journals, 1833–1898. Wilford Woodruff, Journals and Papers, 1828–1898. CHL. MS 1352.
The draft notes for JS’s history indicate that the letter was “to be revised” for inclusion in the history. An abridged version was included in the history. (Historian’s Office, JS History, Draft Notes, 2 July 1844, 6; JS History, vol. F-1, 232–234.)
“Letters to and from the Prophet,” ca. 1904, [3], Historian’s Office, Catalogs and Inventories, 1846–1904, CHL.
Historian’s Office. Catalogs and Inventories, 1846–1904. CHL. CR 100 130.
See the full bibliographic entry for JS Collection, 1827–1844, in the CHL catalog.
Historical Introduction
Historical Introduction
Footnotes
JS, Journal, 13 May 1844; Council of Fifty, “Record,” 13 May 1844; Richards, Journal, 14 May 1844.
Richards, Willard. Journals, 1836–1853. Willard Richards, Papers, 1821–1854. CHL. MS 1490, boxes 1–2.
JS, Journal, 20 May 1844. It is unclear why Wight received financial support for his mission while Kimball and others did not.
Kimball, Journal, 2–8 June 1844. It is unclear whether William Smith went to Washington DC along with Wight and Kimball. Neither Wight nor Kimball mentioned Smith’s participation in any of their efforts in Washington DC, and Hyde referred to meeting with only “Elders Kimball and Wight” on 8 June, which suggests that if Smith did travel to Washington, he was no longer in the city by that date. (Letter from Orson Hyde, 9 June 1844.)
Kimball, Heber C. Journal, June 1837–Feb. 1838; Feb.–Mar. 1840; May 1846–Feb. 1847. Heber C. Kimball, Papers, 1837–1866. CHL. MS 627, box 3, fd. 2.
Lyman Wight and Heber C. Kimball, Petition to U.S. Senate and House of Representatives, 7 June 1844, [2], Record Group 46, Records of the U.S. Senate, National Archives, Washington DC. The day before he and Wight submitted the petition, Kimball recorded that he had received a divine communication “that Congress would not do anny thing fore us.” Reconciling himself to this impression, Kimball wrote, “I do not care wheather they do or not. it is none of thares to give. my Father in heaven owns it all and he will give it to [us] so let them go to thare own place.” The following day, when Wight and Kimball met with Orson Hyde, they informed him that the sentiments of the Council of Fifty were that “it was not expected that Congress would do any thing for us” and that the memorials would serve “only to tease them.” (Kimball, Journal, 6 June 1844; Letter from Orson Hyde, 9 June 1844.)
Wight, Lyman, and Heber C. Kimball. Petition to U.S. Senate and House of Representatives, 1844. Petitions, Memorials, Resolutions of State Legislatures, and Related Documents Which Were Referred to the Committee on Public Lands during the 28th Congress. Petitions and Memorials, 1816–1948. Record Group 46, Records of the U.S. Senate, 1789–2015. National Archives, Washington DC.
Kimball, Heber C. Journal, June 1837–Feb. 1838; Feb.–Mar. 1840; May 1846–Feb. 1847. Heber C. Kimball, Papers, 1837–1866. CHL. MS 627, box 3, fd. 2.
Lyman Wight and Heber C. Kimball, Petition to U.S. Senate and House of Representatives, 7 June 1844, [2], Record Group 46, Records of the U.S. Senate, National Archives, Washington DC.
Wight, Lyman, and Heber C. Kimball. Petition to U.S. Senate and House of Representatives, 1844. Petitions, Memorials, Resolutions of State Legislatures, and Related Documents Which Were Referred to the Committee on Public Lands during the 28th Congress. Petitions and Memorials, 1816–1948. Record Group 46, Records of the U.S. Senate, 1789–2015. National Archives, Washington DC.
Letter from Orson Hyde, 9 June 1844; Letter to Orson Hyde and Orson Pratt, 13 May 1844. JS and the council wrote to Hyde and Pratt, rebuking Hyde for some changes he made to a memorial asking Congress to make JS a member of the United States Army.
Kimball, Journal, 20–23 June 1844.
Kimball, Heber C. Journal, June 1837–Feb. 1838; Feb.–Mar. 1840; May 1846–Feb. 1847. Heber C. Kimball, Papers, 1837–1866. CHL. MS 627, box 3, fd. 2.
A notation written in pencil, possibly by clerk Robert L. Campbell, on the final page of this letter records that it was “received 2d July.” Accordingly, extracts from this letter were later placed in JS’s history under the date 2 July. William Clayton’s diary, however, makes clear that the letter did not arrive in Nauvoo until 12 July. (Historian’s Office, JS History, Draft Notes, 2 July 1844, 6; JS History, vol. F-1, 247; Clayton, Journal, 12 July 1844.)
Clayton, William. Journals, 1842–1845. CHL.
Clayton, History of the Nauvoo Temple, 31.
Clayton, William. History of the Nauvoo Temple, ca. 1845. CHL. MS 3365.
Clayton, Journal, 12–13 July 1844. It is possible that Kimball delivered some of this money to Emma Smith on 8 August 1844. (Kimball, Journal, 8 Aug. 1844.)
Clayton, William. Journals, 1842–1845. CHL.
Kimball, Heber C. Journal, June 1837–Feb. 1838; Feb.–Mar. 1840; May 1846–Feb. 1847. Heber C. Kimball, Papers, 1837–1866. CHL. MS 627, box 3, fd. 2.
Source Note
Source Note
Document Transcript
Document Information
Document Information
Footnotes
Footnotes
Young traveled from Pittsburgh to Kirtland, Ohio, and from there went on to Boston. (Young, Journal, 3–4, 8, and 15–16 June 1844; Letter to Brigham Young, 17 and 20 June 1844.)
Young, Brigham. Journals, 1832–1877. Brigham Young Office Files, 1832–1878. CHL. CR 1234 1, boxes 71–73.
Kimball’s journal does not mention whether William Smith traveled to Washington DC with him and Lyman Wight. (Kimball, Journal, 31 May and 1–2 June 1844.)
Kimball, Heber C. Journal, June 1837–Feb. 1838; Feb.–Mar. 1840; May 1846–Feb. 1847. Heber C. Kimball, Papers, 1837–1866. CHL. MS 627, box 3, fd. 2.
The diagonal avenue connecting the White House with the United States Capitol Building.
This was an allusion to Puritan John Bunyan’s novel Pilgrim’s Progress, in which he narrates the metaphorical dream-journey of a man named Christian. In his journey, Christian becomes trapped in “the Slough of Despond.” The novel described the “miry slough” as “such a place as cannot be mended: it is the descent whither the scum and filth that attends conviction for sin doth continually run.” It was a place of “fears and doubts, and discouraging apprehensions.” Methodists and several other denominations frequently reprinted and used Bunyan’s book during the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. While he went on to describe the people in Washington DC, Lyman Wight may also have been referring to the humidity in the city. Although Pennsylvania Avenue was macadamized in the 1830s, several streets were mired, and portions of the district remained malarial swamplands until the 1860s. (Bunyan, Pilgrim’s Progress, 20–21; Stamp, “Historical Memoranda Relating to the ‘Pilgrim’s Progress’ of John Bunyan,” 56–62; Andrews, Methodists and Revolutionary America, 99; McArdle, “Development of the Business Sector in Washington, D.C., 1800–1973,” 564; Caemmerer, “Topographic Features Relating to the Plan of Washington, D.C.,” 17.)
Bunyan, John. The Pilgrim’s Progress. London: John Murray, 1839.
Stamp, John S. “Historical Memoranda Relating to the ‘Pilgrim’s Progress’ of John Bunyan.” Wesleyan-Methodist Magazine 67 (Jan. 1844): 52–62.
Andrews, Dee E. The Methodists and Revolutionary America, 1760–1800: The Shaping of an Evangelical Culture. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000.
McArdle, Walter F. “The Development of the Business Sector in Washington, D.C., 1800–1973." Records of the Columbia Historical Society of Washington, D.C. 49 (1973/1974):556–594.
Caemmerer, H. Paul. “Topographic Features Relating to the Plan of Washington, D. C." Military Engineer 44, no. 297 (Jan.–Feb. 1952): 15–19.