The Papers
Browse the PapersDocumentsJournalsAdministrative RecordsRevelations and TranslationsHistoriesLegal RecordsFinancial RecordsOther Contemporary Papers
Reference
PeoplePlacesEventsGlossaryLegal GlossaryFinancial GlossaryCalendar of DocumentsWorks CitedFeatured TopicsLesson PlansRelated Publications
Media
VideosPhotographsIllustrationsChartsMapsPodcasts
News
Current NewsArchiveNewsletterSubscribeJSP Conferences
About
About the ProjectJoseph Smith and His PapersFAQAwardsEndorsementsReviewsEditorial MethodNote on TranscriptionsNote on Images of People and PlacesReferencing the ProjectCiting This WebsiteProject TeamContact Us
Published Volumes
  1. Home > 
  2. The Papers > 

Discourse, 7 March 1844–A, as Reported by Willard Richards

Source Note

JS, Discourse, [, Hancock Co., IL, 7 Mar. 1844]. Featured version inscribed [ca. 7 Mar. 1844] in JS, Journal, 1842–1844, bk. 4, pp. [10]–[15]; handwriting of ; JS Collection, CHL. For more complete source information, see the source note for JS, Journal, 1842–1844.

Historical Introduction

On 7 March 1844, at the site where the was being built in , Illinois, JS delivered a discourse about recent challenges to the temple’s progress and city’s development. Three days earlier, JS had called the meeting, which noted was attended by “six or eight thousand saints.” JS gave two discourses, separated by sermons by several other members.
In JS’s first discourse of the meeting, he presented three specific examples of recent conflict caused by citizens. He briefly referenced , who had allegedly accused of having multiple “spiritual wives” and had claimed that many of Nauvoo’s females lived as prostitutes. JS then spoke of and , who were longtime landowners in the area and whose intervention in collecting wharfage from steamboat operators had occupied the city council two days earlier. He concluded by accusing local physician of writing an antagonistic, anonymous letter that had appeared in the New-York Daily Tribune at the end of January 1844.
, who was JS’s “private se[c]retary & historian,” recorded the discourse in JS’s journal, which he was keeping for JS. recorded the discourse in his own journal. Woodruff inadvertently duplicated a few phrases, which suggests that he was copying the text from another source, presumably rough notes that he made while at the meeting. In addition to the accounts by Richards and Woodruff, one of the principal targets of JS’s criticism——made an account. On 12 April 1844, Foster wrote a letter to , editor of the Warsaw Signal, in which he acerbically summarized the meeting. All three accounts of the discourse are featured here.

Footnotes

  1. [1]

    JS, Journal, 4 Mar. 1844; Woodruff, Journal, 7 Mar. 1844.

    Woodruff, Wilford. Journals, 1833–1898. Wilford Woodruff, Journals and Papers, 1828–1898. CHL. MS 1352.

  2. [2]

    JS, Journal, 7 Mar. 1844; see also Discourse, 7 Mar. 1844–B.

  3. [3]

    John Scott, Testimony, Nauvoo, IL, 26 Feb. 1844, City of Nauvoo v. Bostwick (Nauvoo Mayor’s Ct. 1844), Nauvoo, IL, Records, CHL. The previous month, the Nauvoo mayor’s court fined Bostwick for slander. Following the trial, Bostwick’s attorney, Francis M. Higbee, said he would appeal the decision to the municipal court and, if necessary, to the circuit court—a move JS interpreted as an attempt to stir up a mob against Latter-day Saints in Nauvoo. Although the case was later brought before the circuit court, it was dismissed in May at Bostwick’s request, for unspecified reasons. (JS, Journal, 26 Feb. 1844; Notice, 9 Apr. 1844.)

  4. [4]

    See Resolution, 5 Mar. 1844.

  5. [5]

    “The Mormons and Their Prophet—Legislation at Nauvoo—The Temple,” New-York Daily Tribune (New York City), 27 Jan. 1844, [1].

    New-York Daily Tribune. New York City. 1841–1924.

  6. [6]

    JS, Journal, 21 Dec. 1842; Historical Introduction to JS, Journal, Dec. 1842–June 1844.

  7. [7]

    “Important from Nauvoo,” Warsaw (IL) Signal, 25 Apr. 1844, [3].

Asterisk (*) denotes a "featured" version, which includes an introduction and annotation. *Discourse, 7 March 1844–A, as Reported by Willard Richards Journal, December 1842–June 1844; Book 4, 1 March–22 June 1844 *Discourse, 7 March 1844–A, as Reported by Wilford Woodruff *Discourse, 7 March 1844–A, as Reported by Charles A. Foster History, 1838–1856, volume E-1 [1 July 1843–30 April 1844] “History of Joseph Smith”

Page [15]

much.— who dont know. that we can put the roof on this buildi[n]g this season? by tur[n]ing all the means of the & doubli[n]g our diligen[ce] we can do it.Three days earlier, at a meeting of leaders and the , JS proposed discontinuing work on the until the was completed. (JS, Journal, 4 Mar. 1844.)
The best way for such m[e]n is to be still. If I did not love men I woud not reprove them. but work in the dark as they do—— read the Tribun[e] & you see for yourself—
he is not a Lawyer— he is nearer related to a Doctor. a small man.— “Mr McNiel— enquired if he was the man.—” No did not know you— you are a st[r]anger.—— [p. [15]]
View entire transcript

|

Cite this page

Source Note

Document Transcript

Page [15]

Document Information

Related Case Documents
Editorial Title
Discourse, 7 March 1844–A, as Reported by Willard Richards
ID #
1288
Total Pages
6
Print Volume Location
Handwriting on This Page
  • Willard Richards

Footnotes

  1. [11]

    Later in the meeting, it became clear that JS was referring to Charles A. Foster, brother of Nauvoo physician Robert D. Foster, as the writer of the letter. (JS, Journal, 7 Mar. 1844.)

© 2024 by Intellectual Reserve, Inc. All rights reserved.Terms of UseUpdated 2021-04-13Privacy NoticeUpdated 2021-04-06